Published Nov 30, 2022



PLUMX
Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


DR. Saad Hasan Talib *

Adnan Abd Al adheem Kadhim

Rashid Mohammed Ali altayyar

Article Details

Abstract

Back ground: The inguinal hernia is the most common general surgical procedure performed nowadays. there are multiple types of hernia repair for inguinal hernia but no one chosen to be the standard.


 Aim of the study:  Is to compare two tension-free techniques of inguinal hernia repair, the Moloney darn repair (MDR) and Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty (LMH) in respect to operative time, hospital stay, and post-operative analgesia, complication and recurrence rate. Patients and Methods:  A total of 120 patients with primary inguinal hernia were selected from January 2019 to January 2021. The patients were distributed in to two types of tension free hernia repair. 60 patients were treated with Moloney darn repair and categorized as a group A. 60 patients were treated with Lichtenstein hernioplasty and categorized as a group B. Results:  One hundred twenty patients were included, 114 males and 6 females. There was significant difference in mean operative time, as in group A was 55 min. and in group B was 46 min. In mean hospital stay, there is no significant difference, as in group A was 35 hours and in group B was 33 hours. Post-operative analgesia used in 82/120 (68.3%) patients, with 50/60 (83.3%) patients in group A and 32/60 (53.3%) patients in group B. Post-operative complications occurred in 27/120 (22.5%) patients, 15/60 (25%) Patients in group A and 12/60 (20%) patients in group B. Recurrence occurred in 4/120 (3.3%) patients all of them in group A (6.6%), and no recurrence in group B. Conclusion:  From data analysis we confirm that open mesh repair for primary inguinal hernia are associated with less complications and less or sometimes no `recurrence rate, also with less operative time and hospital Stay, as compared with darn.

Keywords
References
1. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. "Tension-free" inguinal hernioplasty. Surgery 1993; 114:3.
2. Kaynak B, Celik F, Guner A, Guler K, Kaya MA, Celik M. 'Moloney darn repair versus Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty for open inguinal hernia repair' (surg today 2007; 37(11):958-60.Epub 2007 oct25).
3. W.W.Vrijland, M.P. van den Tol, R.W.Luijendijk, W.C.J.Hop*, J.J.V.Busschbach, D.C.D.delange, D.Van Gelder.'randomized clinical trials of non-mesh vesus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia repair (Brit J surg 2002, 89,293-297).
4. Professor A. Grant.EU hernia trialist's collaboration secretariat "mesh compare with non-mesh methods of open inguinal hernia. (Brit J surg 2000, 87,854-859).
5. Rose K, Wright D, Ward T, Mc Collume. 'Tension-free mesh hernia repair and reccurrence after one year. (Ann R coll surg Engl. 1999 sep; 81(5):329-32).
6. Chakraborty swarup, Mukherjee."Tension-free" inguinal hernia repair comparing Darn with mesh. (Indian J surg, 2007; 69(2):52-56).
7. Barth RJ Jr, Burchard KW,tosteson A,Sutton JEJr,"a randomized prospective study.(surg 1998;123:121-6)
8. MC Gillicuddy JE.prospective randomized comparison of the shouldice & Lichtenstein hernia repair procedurs, (Arch surg 1998; 133:974-8.)
9. Sakovsafas GH, Halikias I, Nissotakis, Kotsifopoulos N, Stavrou A, Antonopolosc, 'open tension-free repair of inguinal hernia; the Lichtenstein technique.(BMC surg. 2001;1:3. Epub2001 oct 15)
10. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL, 'mesh comparing with non-mesh methods of open inguinal hernia repair. (Br j surg. 2001 mar; 88(3):471.
11. Friis E, Lindahl F. the tension-free hernioplasty in a randomized trial. Am J surg 1996; 172:315-19.
12. Davis M, Thomas M. early results with Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair. Brit J surg, 1994;81: 1478-79
13. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, the tension-free hernioplasty, Am J surg 1989; 157:188-193.
14. Schumpelickv, Klinge; 2003 prosthetic implants for hernia repair. (Br J surg; 90:1457-1458).
15. Wantz GE. Abdominal wall hernias. In:Schwartz SI ed. Principl of surgery new York Mc Graw Hill 1999;7:1585611.
16. Memon As, Ahmed SA. Management of inguinal hernia. Experience of 334 cases at Hyderabad. J coll, phys surg pak. 1993; 3(2):50-3.
17. Prior MJ. Williams EV "prospective randomized controlled trial comparing Lichtenstein with modified Bassini. JR coll surg Edinb 1998; 43:88-6.
18. Taylor SG. O'Dwyer PJ. Groin sepsis following tension-free inguinal hernioplasty. Brit J surg 1999; 86:562-5.
19. Callesen T,Bech K, Kehel H, prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair.Br J surg199 9;86:1528-31.
20. Condon RE. Groin pain after hernia repair. Ann surg 2001; 233:8.
21. Van den Tol MP, Lange DcD, Luijendijkrw, Rottier AB, Van Geldere D, vegt PA et al. conventional vs open "tension-free"hernioplasty Br J surg 1996;83:75.
22. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. Demographic classification of hernia repair in the United States, Surg clin North Am 1993; 73:413.
23. Read RC: prosthesis in abdominal wall hernia surgery in prosthesis & hernia, Bendarid R(ed): title; Austin, TX: RG lands 1994, p2.
24. Kuber M, Belsham PA, Kark AE: The Lichtenstein repair surg clin north Am 1998, 78: 1025_1046.
Section
Research Articles